Florida Created a New Felony Offense Effective October 1, 2026
Florida now has a specific criminal statute addressing fraudulent entry into residential rental dwellings. Florida Statute § 817.537 became effective October 1, 2026, and targets specified fraud used to enter into and take possession of a residential dwelling unit. Because the law is new, people accused under it may be dealing with an offense they had never heard of before police contacted them. The charge is serious because Florida classifies a violation as a third-degree felony.
This law does not criminalize every inaccurate statement on a rental application. The State must prove the specific statutory requirements, including knowing and willful conduct, a covered form of fraud, and the connection between that fraud and entering into and taking possession of a residential dwelling.
What Does Florida Statute § 817.537 Prohibit?
The statute applies to residential dwelling units and uses definitions tied to Florida's landlord-tenant law in § 83.43. In summary, § 817.537 prohibits knowingly and willfully entering into and taking possession of a residential dwelling through specified fraudulent methods.
The prohibited conduct includes making a materially false written statement relating to identity in a residential rental application. It also includes presenting forged, fictitious, or counterfeit documents to a landlord, with examples including driver's licenses, identification cards, bank statements, and pay stubs.
A third category involves impersonating another person whose name is used in the rental application for purposes of executing the rental agreement or taking possession of the dwelling.
The Crime Is a Third-Degree Felony
A violation of § 817.537 is a third-degree felony. Florida's general felony-penalty statutes can expose a person convicted of a third-degree felony to up to five years of imprisonment and a fine of up to $5,000, subject to applicable sentencing rules and enhancements.
A felony conviction can also affect employment, housing, professional licensing, firearm rights, immigration status for noncitizens, and future sentencing. The consequences can therefore extend well beyond a landlord-tenant dispute.
That is why I would not treat the accusation as merely a dispute over an apartment application. Once law enforcement and prosecutors become involved, the State is alleging criminal fraud.
Materially False Identity Statements Are Different From Ordinary Application Errors
One important phrase in § 817.537 is "materially false." The statute does not simply say that any mistake on an application creates a felony.
Suppose someone writes an old address incorrectly, transposes numbers, or misunderstands a question. Those facts may be quite different from deliberately submitting another person's identity to secure possession.
I would focus closely on what was allegedly false, whether it related to identity, why it was material, who supplied the information, and whether the State can prove knowledge and willfulness.
Forged and Counterfeit Documents Can Become Central Evidence
The statute specifically addresses forged, fictitious, or counterfeit documents presented to a landlord. Examples listed in the statute include identification documents, bank statements, and pay stubs.
Digital rental applications can make attribution complicated. Documents may pass through brokers, roommates, relatives, online portals, property managers, or third-party screening services before a lease is approved.
The fact that a false document appears in an application file does not necessarily prove who created it or knowingly presented it. Digital metadata, emails, IP records, account information, text messages, witnesses, and application-platform records may become important defense evidence.
Impersonating Another Person Can Lead to the Same Felony Charge
Section 817.537 also applies when a person impersonates another individual whose name is used in a rental application for the purpose of executing a rental agreement or taking possession.
Identity theft allegations can therefore overlap factually with this offense. Depending on the conduct alleged, prosecutors may investigate additional fraud or identity-related statutes as well.
I examine whether the State can prove actual impersonation rather than mistake, shared information, authorization, or confusion involving applicants with similar names.
The State Must Prove Knowing and Willful Conduct
Intent can become one of the most important defense issues. The statute expressly requires that the prohibited conduct be undertaken knowingly and willfully.
If a third party prepared false documents without your knowledge, the prosecution may have difficulty proving the necessary state of mind. The same may be true when incorrect information resulted from error rather than deliberate deception.
I look for contemporaneous communications rather than relying solely on what people say after an investigation begins. Messages exchanged before the lease can show what you knew and what you believed.
Taking Possession Is an Important Part of the Statute
The statutory language addresses entering into and taking possession of the residential dwelling through the specified conduct. That makes the factual sequence important.
An unsuccessful fraudulent application may raise other legal issues, but § 817.537 specifically focuses on fraudulent entry and possession. I would examine whether a lease was actually executed, whether possession occurred, and who occupied the property.
The prosecution must prove the charged statute rather than relying on a general allegation that something about a rental application looked suspicious.
Possible Defenses to Fraudulent Entry of a Residential Dwelling
Potential defenses depend on the evidence. Lack of knowledge, lack of willfulness, immaterial error, authorization, mistaken identity, lack of possession, unreliable digital attribution, or insufficient proof that the accused submitted the disputed document may all become important.
I may also challenge searches of phones, computers, email accounts, cloud storage, or residences if police obtained evidence in violation of constitutional protections. Statements can be challenged when law enforcement fails to honor applicable constitutional rights.
A private attorney can also prevent a client from trying to explain complicated rental documents to investigators without first understanding the evidence.
Example of How I May Build the Defense
Consider an Orlando apartment applicant who uses a roommate to assemble financial documentation because the applicant is traveling for work. The property manager later determines that a pay stub uploaded through the rental portal was altered and reports suspected fraud to law enforcement.
The applicant insists that he provided accurate employment information and never saw the altered document. I would obtain the portal records, upload logs, emails, text messages, document metadata, employer records, and communications between the roommates to determine who created and transmitted the file.
If the evidence shows that someone else altered the document without my client's knowledge, I would focus on the statute's knowing-and-willful requirement. I would also examine whether the disputed document actually related to the offense charged and whether all elements of § 817.537 can be proved.
This is an illustrative defense scenario and not a representation of a specific Musca Law result.
Why a Private Attorney Matters Under a New Criminal Statute
New criminal statutes can produce aggressive early enforcement and unresolved interpretive questions. Police reports may use broad terms such as "fraudulent lease" even though the statute contains precise elements.
I can compare the prosecution's theory directly with the statutory language, preserve electronic evidence, investigate who created disputed documents, challenge intent, and address unlawful searches or questioning. If the evidence cannot establish every element, I can pursue dismissal or prepare the case for trial.
When complete dismissal is not achievable, I can also examine whether charges can be reduced and whether sentencing exposure can be minimized.
FAQs About Fraudulent Entry of Residential Dwellings
Is Lying on Any Part of a Rental Application Now a Felony?
No. Section 817.537 targets specified fraudulent conduct connected with entering into and taking possession of a residential dwelling.
One statutory category concerns materially false written statements relating to identity. The precise false statement and its connection to the rental must therefore be examined.
What If Someone Else Created the Fake Pay Stub?
Knowledge and willfulness are required. If another person created or altered a document without your knowledge, that fact may provide a substantial defense.
Digital evidence can help establish who created, modified, uploaded, or transmitted a file. I would preserve that evidence before accounts or devices change.
What If I Used a Nickname or Former Name?
Using a nickname or former name is not automatically the same as intentionally making a materially false identity statement. Context and intent matter.
I would examine whether the landlord was actually misled about your identity and what other identifying information was provided.
What Is the Maximum Penalty?
Section 817.537 classifies the offense as a third-degree felony. Florida law generally allows up to five years of imprisonment and a fine of up to $5,000 for a third-degree felony, subject to sentencing rules and any applicable enhancements.
A felony adjudication can also carry substantial collateral consequences. Protecting the record can therefore be as important as avoiding incarceration.
Can Fraudulent Entry Charges Be Dismissed?
Yes, when the State lacks evidence establishing the statutory elements or when admissible evidence must be suppressed. Lack of knowledge, lack of willfulness, mistaken identity, document-authorship problems, and failure to prove possession can all potentially matter.
Whether dismissal is realistic depends on the actual evidence. I would want the complete rental file and digital records before evaluating the strength of the charge.
Is This the Same as Burglary?
No. Fraudulent entry of a residential dwelling under § 817.537 is located in Florida's fraudulent-practices chapter and concerns specified deception used to obtain residential rental possession.
Burglary under § 810.02 involves different elements relating to entry or remaining with criminal intent. A prosecution must prove the offense actually charged.
Call Our Orlando Defense Attorney for Fraudulent Residential Entry Charges
Florida's new fraudulent-entry law can expose an accused person to a third-degree felony based on identity statements, rental documents, or alleged impersonation. I can examine the application, digital records, document creation, communications, intent, possession, searches, and statements while pursuing dismissal, reduction, acquittal, or reduced penalties based on the evidence.
Contact Musca Law 24/7/365 at 1-888-484-5057 For Your FREE Consultation.
Musca Law, P.A. has a team of experienced criminal defense attorneys dedicated to defending people charged with a criminal or traffic offense. We are available 24/7/365 at 1-888-484-5057 for your FREE consultation. We have 35 office locations throughout the state of Florida and serve all counties in Florida, including Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa, Orlando, St. Petersburg, Hialeah, Port St. Lucie, Cape Coral, Tallahassee, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Gainesville, Clearwater, Lakeland, Hollywood, Pembroke Pines, Fort Myers, Naples, Daytona Beach, Pensacola, the Florida Panhandle, and every county in Florida.