How Alcohol-Based Sanitizers Can Trigger Inaccurate Breath Test Results and What You Can Do About It


You probably never imagined that the same hand sanitizer used to protect your health could play a role in your arrest. But in some rare cases, alcohol-based hand sanitizers have led to false positives on roadside breath tests. I’ve seen this happen firsthand, and I know how frightening it is to be accused of driving under the influence when you haven’t had a drop to drink. Florida’s DUI laws are strict, and when a breath test result suggests intoxication, officers often make a quick arrest without investigating further. That’s why it’s critical to understand how certain substances, including hand sanitizers, can affect the outcome of a preliminary breath test, and why having a private defense attorney matters from the moment those blue lights flash.


How Hand Sanitizers Can Skew Preliminary Breath Tests

The alcohol in hand sanitizers is usually ethanol or isopropanol, and when it evaporates, it can linger in the air around your mouth and nose. Breathalyzers, particularly the handheld devices used roadside by officers, are sensitive instruments that analyze the air in your lungs for the presence of alcohol vapor. When you've just applied hand sanitizer in a closed vehicle, that vapor can be detected as if it came from your bloodstream, especially if the test is administered too soon after use.

This issue is more common than people think, especially during traffic stops when drivers apply sanitizer after handling documents or steering wheels touched by others. What happens next is alarming: you’re asked to blow into a device, and the reading shows alcohol, even if you haven’t consumed any. Once that result appears on the screen, many officers treat it as conclusive evidence, placing you under arrest for DUI. But the science behind these tests has limits, and those limits are why you need someone in your corner who understands how to challenge the process.


Florida’s DUI Laws and Presumptions of Impairment

Florida Statute § 316.193 defines driving under the influence as operating a vehicle while impaired by alcohol, chemical substances, or controlled substances. A blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 or higher creates a presumption of impairment, but that presumption can be rebutted.

Florida Statute § 316.193(1)(c):
“A person is presumed to be under the influence of alcoholic beverages to the extent that the person's normal faculties are impaired if there was at that time 0.08 percent or more by weight of alcohol in the person’s blood or breath.”

The issue is that the roadside breath test, known as a Preliminary Breath Test (PBT), is not always reliable enough to be admitted into evidence at trial. However, it’s often used by officers to justify a DUI arrest, which then subjects you to further testing, license suspension, and potential prosecution. By the time you're standing in front of a judge, the entire system is moving against you—unless you have someone who can take it apart.

As a private DUI defense attorney, I evaluate every step of the stop, from the officer’s observations to the breath test calibration records. Public defenders are often overburdened and may not have the time or resources to examine whether environmental contaminants, such as alcohol vapor from sanitizer, tainted the test results.


Real Case Example: DUI Arrest Dismissed After Sanitizer Interference

One of my clients, a nurse in Sarasota, was pulled over late at night for a broken tail light. She had just finished a 12-hour hospital shift and applied a generous amount of hand sanitizer before reaching for her registration. The officer claimed to smell alcohol and requested a roadside breath test, which showed a BAC of 0.10.

She was arrested immediately.

At first glance, the case looked straightforward, but during our first meeting, she insisted she had not consumed any alcohol that day. We began investigating, pulling the dash cam and body cam footage, and found that she applied hand sanitizer moments before the test. The PBT was administered while she was still in her car with the windows up.

We retained a toxicologist who explained how ethanol vapor from hand sanitizer could have caused a false high reading. We also obtained her blood test result from the jail, which came back at 0.00. The state dropped the charges before the arraignment, but only after we presented this evidence.

This was a clear case where proactive defense efforts by a private attorney protected a client’s career, license, and future. Had she relied on a court-appointed attorney without the time to fully investigate the facts, the outcome could have been very different.


Legal Defenses in Cases Involving False Positives

If you’ve been arrested based on a roadside breath test and you hadn’t consumed alcohol, your case is not hopeless. There are multiple defenses that may apply, especially when environmental factors like hand sanitizer come into play.

Improper Use of the Preliminary Breath Test

Florida officers are trained to wait a few minutes before administering a PBT to avoid contamination. If the officer rushed the test or failed to instruct you properly, that’s a problem. We request video, audio, and the officer’s report to see if the device was used correctly.

Lack of Probable Cause

Even if a PBT shows alcohol, officers need other observations to support a DUI arrest. Slurred speech, poor driving, or failed field sobriety tests are typically used. But if those things are absent, and the arrest relies solely on the device, we argue that the officer lacked sufficient grounds to make the arrest.

Scientific Challenges to the Breath Test

The model of device used, its maintenance logs, and its calibration history matter. Some portable devices are more prone to false positives in the presence of ethanol vapor. We subpoena these records and, if necessary, bring in forensic scientists to discredit the result.

These defenses take work. They require investigation, expert testimony, and a strategy tailored to the facts. That’s where a private attorney gives you a real advantage.


Why You Need a Private DUI Defense Attorney for This Type of Case

Breath test errors are often brushed aside by prosecutors unless your attorney insists on uncovering the truth. Public defenders, although hardworking, are often juggling too many cases to conduct a deep forensic review. They may not question the science behind a test that seems accurate on paper.

I don’t take shortcuts. When you hire me, I dig into the details. I’ve won DUI cases others thought were impossible to beat because I understand that every traffic stop is different, every person’s story matters, and the science behind DUI enforcement isn’t infallible.

Whether you're a nurse, a teacher, a student, or someone who simply used too much hand sanitizer, your reputation, license, and future deserve a defense rooted in facts and science.

Musca Law, P.A. has a team of experienced criminal defense attorneys dedicated to defending people charged with a criminal or traffic offense. We are available 24/7/365 at 1-888-484-5057 for your FREE consultation. We have 30 office locations in Florida and serve all counties in Florida.


DUI Defense Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Can hand sanitizer really cause a false positive on a breathalyzer?
Yes. Alcohol-based sanitizers, especially those containing ethanol, can emit vapors that affect the results of handheld breath testing devices used during traffic stops. If the vapor is present in the vehicle or near the person’s mouth at the time of the test, the device can register a higher-than-accurate reading.

How long after using hand sanitizer should I wait before taking a breath test?
Generally, officers are trained to wait 15 to 20 minutes before administering a breath test if there has been potential contamination, such as recent mouth alcohol. Unfortunately, this protocol is often ignored during traffic stops, especially when time is tight or the officer is unaware that hand sanitizer was just used.

Can I still be arrested if my blood test shows zero alcohol?
Yes. The arrest is based on probable cause at the time of the stop. If the officer believes you're impaired based on breath test results and field observations, they can arrest you. However, a clean blood test can later serve as strong evidence in your defense.

What if I told the officer I had not been drinking and they arrested me anyway?
Officers often proceed with arrests based on breath test results and other observations, even if you deny drinking. That’s why it's important not to argue roadside. Let your attorney challenge the evidence later. A private attorney will focus on the inconsistencies and lack of support for the officer’s claims.

Is the roadside breath test admissible in court?
The Preliminary Breath Test (PBT) used during the traffic stop is generally not admissible at trial in Florida. It is used to support probable cause for arrest, not as direct evidence of guilt. The more accurate breath test conducted at the station or jail may be admissible, depending on how it was administered.

How can a lawyer prove the test was contaminated by sanitizer?
We use a combination of dashcam footage, witness statements, body cam footage, and expert toxicologists to show how environmental factors, including hand sanitizer vapor, could have interfered with the results. A private attorney has the resources to gather and present this evidence in a persuasive way.

Does Florida law require a minimum BAC to be arrested for DUI?
No. A person can be arrested for DUI if the officer believes their normal faculties are impaired, even without a breath test. However, a BAC of 0.08 or higher creates a legal presumption of impairment, which can be rebutted with proper defense.

Can I refuse the breath test if I know it might be inaccurate?
You can refuse, but Florida has implied consent laws. A refusal can result in a one-year driver’s license suspension and be used as evidence in court. However, if the test is likely to be contaminated, your attorney can argue that your refusal was reasonable under the circumstances.

What should I say to the officer if I'm pulled over and recently used hand sanitizer?
You are not required to explain yourself or provide any information beyond your license, registration, and insurance. If asked to take a breath test, you may politely ask whether the officer will allow you time to rinse your mouth or wait before testing. But remember, anything you say can be used against you, so it’s often better to say little and let your attorney handle it.

How soon should I contact a lawyer after a DUI arrest?
Immediately. Time matters in DUI cases. Evidence can disappear quickly, especially dashcam or bodycam footage. The sooner your private attorney is involved, the better the chance of uncovering crucial facts that can change the outcome of your case.

Contact Musca Law 24/7/365 at 1-888-484-5057 For Your FREE Consultation

Musca Law, P.A. has a team of experienced criminal defense attorneys dedicated to defending people charged with a criminal or traffic offense. We are available 24/7/365 at 1-888-484-5057 for your FREE consultation. We have 30 office locations in Florida and serve all counties in Florida.